An Interview with Lucia Walker: Part1
- What was the
reason or motivation
or expectation when
you started learning
AT?
I'm
just trying to remember...but
I think my main reason
or motivation was
in wanting to move
more freely and more
accurately. I was
getting interested
in dance at about
the same time. I was
taught a form of dance
finally, that was
also looking at 'good
use', and releasing
into movement instead
of making a lot of
effort. And then there
was also Tai Chi.
So that was at slightly
less mechanical and
more energetic level,
I was learning Tai
Chi. For some reason
I remember coming
out with the feeling
in a very different
state -- much lighter
and fuller and more
powerful. I knew about
AT but not that much,
I suddenly understood
what maybe it was
aiming for. I thought,
"Oh, if it's
something like this,
then I'm very interested..
if I could reach this
place more easily".
There was also that
before I got involved
in movement and was
wondering about training
as a teacher in AT,
I wasn't exactly sure
what I wanted to do
but I was always interested
in education. Then
I started doing a
teacher training for
children, and it wasn't
quite what I wanted
to do. So there's
something about learning
that was always interesting
to me. And it seemed
to be a very interesting
approach to learn.
- Has the reason
changed as you keep
learning?
Yes and no. I think
how I would describe
the reason has changed
a bit. I think it
is probably the same
reason. I often talked
about in teaching
about 'how to be a
human being' , where
those things that
are really precious
but somehow really
difficult for us.
So at another level,
how really to be a
whole person and fulfill
my purpose in life...well,
getting a little closer
to understanding what
that might be.
And I love the process
in teaching of seeing
people seem to get
closer to expressing
themselves more fully.
That's maybe what
I love the most -
it's when I sense
myself expressed in
myself more fully,
and see other people
doing that.
- As a personal
experience, have
there been anything
that you particularly
felt you benefited
from learning AT?
Yes, I did think
it helped me learn
how to dance, and
helped me understand
why I like to do that.
And.. oh there're
lots of things.. I
think it has helped
me be more happy.
But it's quite hard
to tell, because over
time you don't know
what would have been
there without. But
the principles really
give me a way to stay
interested in life
and also in something
about.. I suppose
it's sensory pleasures
- pleasure in whatever
happens.
-You've been doing
something other
than AT as well,
for example dancing.
So I am curious
to hear about the
relationship between
those other things
and AT, for you.
Perhaps it's more
psychological in
nature, or not..
There're quite a
few other things that
I do as well as AT.
-Is it like you
needed those other
things because AT
itself didn't offer
what you wanted
enough?
I'm not sure about
the answer to that,
but yes in a way..
but I was never expecting
AT to.. Well, no,
I don't think it's
that it wasn't enough.
It's that it helped
me be more interested
and available to other
studies and interests.
And with dance and
contact improvisation,
improvisation particularly,
they were supporting
each other. I can't
even imagine learning
one without the other.
Then at personal
level, what's helped
me a lot has been
Chinese medicine,
specifically 'Five
Elements Acupuncture'
- it's a particular
form of acupuncture.
I've been curious
about how that gave
me or helped me so
much in the way that
AT obviously hadn't.
In another way I've
also always found
it a little frustrating
with that, because
it's a healing practice,
it's an intervention
-- you have to have
someone do something
to you. And it did
make me realize how
much I valued AT being
something that, even
though you learn in
interaction, you can
find entirely for
yourself.
It was interesting
because near the beginning
of having treatments
in that, the person
treating me knew a
bit about AT and said
even the energy has
its habits running
in meridians, and
maybe for some reason
it has got into those
habits and it needs
support. And I felt
that.. yes, the treatment
I had in specifically
the relationship with
the practitioner that
I had really gave
me something back
or new or.. something
else.
And then the other
thing both personally
and for teaching,
I think what's given
me one of the biggest
support (but also
AT gave me great support)
in learning and practicing
that, is what's sometimes
called NVC,
Non Violent Communication.
That's the model and
it's very much about
present moment. So
both in terms of communication
and resolving difference,
but also mainly connecting
to people and also
connecting in yourself,
it has kind of been
a really great addition
to me for AT. You
become extremely aware
of habits of language
and communication.
- So the model
is about the wordings
and things like
that?
Well, partly it's
about wordings.. But
as I've studied it
more and practiced
it more, I realize
that although it is
about the language,
what constitutes violent
language which in
the model is basically
judgment and labels.
Even good judgment
- anything that fixes
somebody is violence
in our language. But
actually it's more
about attitude, what
you are doing in yourself,
and what your intention
is in speaking or
communicating. As
I've gone on, I've
realized that. And
that has made it a
bit easier. Because
it's very hard to
change some of the
word patterns. But
in fact if you change,
if you really see
what's behind them,
it changes what happens.
And yes, I'll add
in, with the dance
thing, I have been
teaching and continuing
to teach and perform,
and that's been a
help.
With both acupuncture
and NVC, it has occurred
to me early on in
my time with them,
whether that would
be something I wanted
to do professionally
- train to do and
then do that. And
in both cases which
I found quite exciting,
I thought, "No,
it isn't - these things
I can't imagine my
life without, but
the thing I really
want to do as my work
or that what I have
to do, is AT"
- well, at the moment.
- (everyone) Why?
Partly because it's
what I've learned,
and I know. Partly
because it has these
elements of teaching,
and people learning
and me learning as
a continuous process.
So does NVC. It has
touch and physical
communication in it
which goes underneath
language and thinking,
in a way that's really
precious to me. I
think I discovered
I communicate things
that way, that I hardly
know what they are
but I do know what
they are. And in that
way it's very practical.
I don't only mean
in everyday-life practical,
but I mean it's very
physical. There's
that difficulty with
language, when people
say 'physical', they
think, "Ok, then
it's not emotional,
it's not mental, it's
not spiritual".
I suppose (and that's
part of my general
beliefs) that what
the physical does,
what we can do, is
refine the physical
so that it's more
capable of expressing
all the other layers
of the person. So
It's not about separating,
because they're not
separable. But if
they're more clear
or more clean or more
something, then all
this, the juicy stuff,
can get through.(laugh)
- I myself am
interested in that,
I think it's precious
that AT has this
'physical' aspect
to the approach.
But that approach
doesn't only influence
the physical aspect
-- The influence
goes over to the
psychological, or
spiritual or other
levels (because
those are undividable).
I'm very interested
in the potential
of what AT can do.
I'd like to know
more how that works.
Maybe just to finish
the other question
about why do I want
to do what's called
AT; it's because it's
based on the idea
of unity of a whole
person and observation
of what is happening
now, rather than analysis
of something that
happened before or..
anything else. It's
main principle is
about "What are
you doing now that
you could change if
you wanted to".
I really enjoy that
-- practicing that
teaching. And because
it also has questions
about language and
communication that
interest me.
About the other,
the 'physical' thing;
I mean I'm always
curious when people
say "Oh, yes".
Well, one of my difficulties
with Alexander profession
is that it's been
so resistant to connecting
to any others. Because
it says, in England
especially, I think
it's done a damage
by that. "We're
not going to go to
the alternative /
complementary medicine
fair -- we're not
a medicine, we're
not a healing.",
"No, we are not
going to go into universities
and schools because
we can't do creditations
and exams. We are
different".
So it does have,
and that's why I love
it, this way where
it doesn't fit with
other things. But
I think it's a pity
not to recognize common
ground. And that's
becoming more and
more necessary. So
some people prefer
to be recognized in-with
body workers -- what's
called "body
workers". I don't
like the term, but
of course people working
with the body are
also very interested
in whole parts --
they are not just
interested in the
body. Almost nothing
is [interested just
in the body]. Some
people have a more
mechanical...like
western medicine is
somewhat more mechanical
in terms of intervention
and fixing, and that's
why Alexander was
always going, "We
need to be more indirect".
But many other therapies
work indirectly. So
I think it's a pity
to separate at that
kind of social and
recognition level.
But at another way,
it is different.
But yes, it's curious
when people talk about
it, when they say,
"But you approach
the whole thing through
the body" - because
of course in all our
learning we get drummed
into us that it's
thinking that counts.
So is it? Is that
even ... is Alexander's
doorway body or thought?
Possibly slightly
different styles of
teaching emphasize
one more than another.
And some people talk
about it in a way...I
think Marjory Barlow
used to talk a lot
about the nervous
system, which is of
course quite a bridge
between brain, thinking
and body. I often
talk about what Alexander
says about the "nature
of human reaction".
I like words like
that because reaction
happens at all of
those levels, and
you can't say that's
just physical or emotional.
[Top] [Next]
We'd
love to hear your
feedback and thoughts
to yuriko@littlesounds.com
|